Cases 11 - 20 of 48
Morris v. LeBlanc et al
as 2:2021cv00947
Defendant:
Keith Cooley, Lt Trahan, James M LeBlanc and others
Plaintiff:
Carnell C Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Golub v. Lance et al
as 1:2020cv01251
Defendant:
Eric J. Zahler, Robert L. Phillips, Brian G. Kenning and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Golub
Nominal Defendant:
Maxar Technologies Inc.
Dorling v. Lance et al
as 1:2019cv02134
Defendant:
Eric J. Zahler, Anil Wirasekara, L. Roger Mason Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Dorling
Nominal Defendant:
Maxar Technologies Inc.
USA v. Estes et al
as 5:2019cv00426
Defendant:
Charles J. Estes and Nettie M. Estes
Plaintiff:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Estes v. Lindsay et al
as 2:2018cv00590
Plaintiff:
Wanda M. Estes
Defendant:
Christopher C. Lindsay and Town of Eclectic, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ESTES v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv03780
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. ESTES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Machion v. DigitalGlobe, Inc et al
as 1:2017cv01692
Plaintiff:
Matthew Machion
Defendant:
DigitalGlobe, Inc , MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates, Ltd., Jeffrey R. Tarr and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
machion v. DigitalGlobe, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01691
Plaintiff:
matthew machion
Defendant:
DigitalGlobe, Inc., MacDonald, Dettwiler and Associates, Ltd., General Howell M. Estes, III and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Zand v. DigitalGlobe, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01570
Plaintiff:
Stuart Zand
Defendant:
DigitalGlobe, Inc. , Howell M. Estes, III , Nick S. Cyprus and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078
Zand v. DigitalGlobe, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00592
Plaintiff:
Stuart Zand
Defendant:
DigitalGlobe, Inc. , Howell M. Estes, III , Nick S. Cyprus and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
