Cases 11 - 20 of 53
Bell v. Unnamed Defendant(s)
as 1:2019cv03168
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant(s), Michael H. Finks, Coty Thompson and others
Plaintiff:
George Lee Bell
Respondent:
State of Georgia and Neil Warren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Faine v. Barr et al
as 3:2019cv03009
Defendant:
NP Mary Dambacher, Hughes Louchard, Wesley L Barr and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Faine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glover et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv02270
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Corp, Steve Meeks and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Glover, Curtis A Clark, Danny Lillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roach v. McKesson Corporation, et al
as 1:2018op45662
Plaintiff:
Tyler M Roach
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Cardinal Health Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roach v. McKesson Corporation, et al
as LAE/2:18-cv-04165
Plaintiff:
Tyler M Roach
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Cardinal Health Inc. , AmerisourceBergen Corporation and others
Simpson v. Guess et al
as 3:2018cv00547
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Simpson
Defendant:
J. L. Guess, W. M. Roach, J. I. Minshew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roach v. McKesson Corporation, et al
as 2:2018cv04165
Plaintiff:
Tyler M Roach
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation , Cardinal Health, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe v. Brittonkill Central School District Board of Education et al
as 1:2018cv00142
Defendant:
Questar III (BOCE)S, School Attorney, Richard Pogue and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cornelious v. Roach et al
as 1:2016cv06578
Plaintiff:
Derrick Cornelious
Defendant:
Michele L. Roach and Frances M. Roach
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Case name not on file
as 1:2016cv00011
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
