Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Larry Wynn v. U.S. Postal Service, et al
as 17-12268
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY M. WYNN
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, CLERK OF COURT and FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
WYNN v. POSTAL SERVICE et al
as 4:2017cv00182
Plaintiff:
LARRY M WYNN
Defendant:
POSTAL SERVICE, COURT CLERK and PRISON AUTHORITIES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tina M Wynn v. Aetna Life Insurance
as 2:2016cv03016
Plaintiff:
Tina M Wynn
Defendant:
Aetna Life Insurance
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Jayson Grumbles v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 16-20321
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAYSON GRUMBLES
Defendant - Appellee:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, ABBAS KHOSHDEL, JANE DOE and others
Tina Wynn v. Wal-Mart Stores E, LP
as 16-5039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TINA M. WYNN
Defendant - Appellee:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP
Wynne v. Douglas County Department of Corrections, et al
as 8:2015cv00330
Defendant:
Ernie Block, Douglas County Department of Corrections, Foxall and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen M. Wynne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Lopez v. Sharon Rowie Phillips, et al
as 15-20309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES LOPEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
SHARON Y. ROWIE PHILLIPS, Correctional Officer IV, John M. Wynne Unit, PRESION H. GAJAN, JR., Investigator, John M. Wynne Unit, KELLY L. STRONG, Senior Warden, John M. Wynne Unit and others
Wynn v. McPeak et al
as 1:2015cv00674
Plaintiff:
James M. Wynn
Defendant:
Gerald A. McPeak, Harold W. Clarke and Marty Stallard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grumbles v. Livingston et al
as 4:2014cv03610
Plaintiff:
Jayson Grumbles
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Abbas Khoshdel, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wynne v. Douglas County Department of Corrections
as 8:2014cv00393
Defendant:
Douglas County Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Stephen M. Wynne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
