Cases 11 - 20 of 2,850
Mathis v. 99 Cents Only Stores, LLC
as 2:2024cv00672
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Mathis
Defendant:
99 Cents Only Stores, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mathis v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Eugenio S. Mathis
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Alisha Tafoya Lucero, Wence Asonganyi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Scott v. Everbridge, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00415
Plaintiff:
Robert Scott
Defendant:
Everbridge, Inc., David Henshall, David Benjamin and others
Finger v. Everbridge, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Susan Finger
Defendant:
Everbridge, Inc., David Henshall, David Benjamin and others
Mathis v. 99 Cents Only Stores, LLC
as 2:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Mathis
Defendant:
99 Cents Only Stores, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1303
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
Allen v. New York State Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
as 24-785
Plaintiff:
PETER ALLEN, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, BRIAN BERNARD, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, MARK DANIELS, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
Dr. CAROL MOORES, NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND COMMUNITY SUPERVISION, CHUN LEE, MD and others
Quagliani v. Everbridge, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02223
Plaintiff:
Ray Quagliani
Defendant:
Everbridge, Inc., David Henshall, David Benjamin and others
Titus v Scarface et al
as 4:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
Scarface, Al Pacino, Keef Coff Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1208
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party:
GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
