Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Michael Bullock v. Superintendent Huntingdon SCI, et al
as 17-2476
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL BULLOCK
Defendant - Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT HUNTINGDON SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
In re: Michael Bullock
as 17-2195
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: MICHAEL BULLOCK
Defendant - Respondent:
ERIC TICE, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
JAUN R. SANCHEZ
BULLOCK v. AMERICAN SECURITY PROGRAMS, INC.
as 1:2016cv01645
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BULLOCK
Defendant:
AMERICAN SECURITY PROGRAMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Phillips v. Ifantis et al
as 1:2016cv01112
Plaintiff:
David Wayne Phillips
Defendant:
Dennis Ifantis, Paul Capps, Michael Bullock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BULLOCK v. TICE et al
as 2:2016cv01456
Petitioner:
MICHAEL BULLOCK
Respondent:
ERIC TICE , THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bullock v. Cigna Group Insurance et al
as 3:2015cv00241
Plaintiff:
Michael Bullock
Defendant:
Life Insurance Company of North America and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BULLOCK v. COLVIN
as 2:2013cv03692
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BULLOCK
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bullock v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2011cv00257
Plaintiff:
Randy Michael Bullock
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Griggs v. Tulare District Hospital et al
as 1:2010at00165
Plaintiff:
Chrisma Griggs
Defendant:
Tulare District Hospital, Michael Bullock and Craig Tanaka
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Griggs v. Tulare District Hospital et al
as 1:2010cv00412
Plaintiff:
Chrisma Griggs
Defendant:
Tulare District Hospital, Michael Bullock and Craig Tanaka
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
