Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Bartunek v. United States of America et al
as 8:2018cv00336
Defendant:
Sarah Lund, U.S. Department of Justice, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory P. Bartunek
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Coastal Alabama Community College et al
as 1:2018cv00280
Plaintiff:
Ronald Vincent Williams
Defendant:
Coastal Alabama Community College, Lavon W. Smith, Ms. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv01491
Plaintiff:
John M Bennett
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, Greg Drake, Ms. Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Clarke et al
as 2:2012cv00736
Plaintiff:
Da Vonte Love
Defendant:
David A Clarke, Jr, Richard Schmidt, Kevin Nykelwicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael McKeown v. Doctor Pacheko
as 11-7532
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY MCKEOWN, a/k/a Michael Anthony McKeown
Defendant - Appellee:
DOCTOR PACHEKO, of Mental Health, MRS. GARDNER, Mental Health Case Worker, MS. COOKE, Medical Supervisor and others
Abebe v. Green et al
as 0:2011cv02750
Plaintiff:
Unula Boo-Shawn Abebe
Defendant:
Maurice Green, Lieutenant Scott, Karen McCullough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abebe v. Green et al
as 5:2011cv02750
Plaintiff:
Unula Boo-Shawn Abebe
Defendant:
Maurice Green, Lieutenant Scott, Karen McCullough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kinard v. Ozmitt et al
as 6:2010cv02745
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Kinard
Defendant:
John Ozmitt, Linda Bradshaw and Ms Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKeown v. Pacheko et al
as 1:2010cv01606
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony McKeown
Defendant:
Dr Pacheko, Mrs Gardner, Ms Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schaller v. Ardnt et al
as 3:2007cv00633
Plaintiff:
Nick William Schaller, Sr.
Defendant:
Rebecca Ardnt, Ken Persson, Deann Persson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
