Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Solazzo v. Blackburn et al
as 1:2018cv02391
Defendant:
Boland, T. Tymkovich, Robert E. Blackburn and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Solazzo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxton v. Lynch et al
as 1:2015cv01402
Plaintiff:
Theron J. Maxton
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, E. Holder, Melissa Swagger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kenneth Smith v. Antonin Scalia, et al
as 14-5180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth L. Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, John G. Roberts and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1599
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1575
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jiron v. Krieger et al
as 1:2014mc00055
Plaintiff:
Lawrence M. Jiron
Defendant:
Marcia S. Krieger, Wiley Y. Daniel, Christine M. Arguello and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00007
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Boston Private Bank and Trust Company v. Snake River Sporting Club Development Company, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv13043
Plaintiff:
Boston Private Bank and Trust Company
Defendant:
Snake River Sporting Club Development Company, LLC, Snake River Sporting Club, Inc., Dean Gary A. Barney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00267
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Gail Hutto v. SC Retirement System
as 13-1523
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GAIL M. HUTTO, ELIZABETH W. HODGE, MARGARET B. LINEBERGER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
THE SOUTH CAROLINA RETIREMENT SYSTEM, THE POLICE OFFICERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM, THE SOUTH CAROLINA RETIREMENT SYSTEMS GROUP TRUST and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
