Cases 11 - 20 of 38
CALLAHAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv71880
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CALLAHAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Darnell Smith, et al v. City of Chicago, et al
as 19-8014
Respondent:
GARRY MCCARTHY, ANTHONY GEMIGNANI, MICHAEL CALLAHAN and others
Petitioner:
MARCELL DAVIS, DARREN NATHAN, DARNELL SMITH and others
Rice v. Murphy et al
as 1:2017cv06887
Defendant:
Justinian Mateo, Chris Bane, Earnest Cortez and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery E. Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manuel Vasquez v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2017cv01365
Defendant:
Investigator Michael Callahan, County of Riverside, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Manuel Vasquez
HE et al v. YAHOO! INC. et al
as 1:2017cv00635
Defendant:
YAHOO! INC. , MICHAEL CALLAHAN , RONALD BELL and others
Plaintiff:
DEPU HE , ZILI YANG , DAWEI LI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Callahan v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2017cv00144
Plaintiff:
Michael Callahan
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sharber v. Bolton et al
as 3:2016cv00526
Plaintiff:
Darryn Brett Sharber
Defendant:
Mark Bolton, City of Louisville, Louisville Metro Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Callahan et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2015cv02304
Plaintiff:
Michael Callahan and Priscilla Callahan
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Callahan et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as NYN/5:00-cv-01263
Plaintiff:
Michael Callahan and Priscilla Callahan
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Callahan et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01263
Plaintiff:
Michael Callahan and Priscilla Callahan
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
