Cases 11 - 20 of 27
McNeill et al v. FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv10940
Plaintiff:
Barbara McNeill and Michael McNeill
Defendant:
FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. d/b/a Fresenius Medical Care North America, Fresenius USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sinclair v. City of Lumberton et al
as 7:2012cv00006
Plaintiff:
John Sinclair
Defendant:
City of Lumberton, City of Lumberton Police Department, Michael McNeill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Sinclair v. State of North Carolina et al
as 7:2012cv00007
Plaintiff:
John Sinclair
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, City of Lumberton, Robeson County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
McNeill v. Young Moore and Henderson, P.A.'s, et al
as 5:2010cv00543
Plaintiff:
Michael McNeill
Defendant:
Young Moore and Henderson, P.A.'s, et al
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McNeill v. Young, Moore and Henderson, P.A. et al
as 5:2010mc00054
Petitioner:
Michael McNeill
Respondent:
Young, Moore and Henderson, P.A. and Frank Stamper
Michael McNeill v. David Cooke
as 10-6658
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MCNEILL
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID COOKE, Wake County Manager
Michael McNeill v. Lanesboro Correctional Adminis
as 09-7960
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MCNEILL
Defendant - Appellee:
LANESBORO CORRECTIONAL ADMINISTRATION STAFF
Michael McNeill v. Officer Ashley
as 09-7602
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MCNEILL
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER ASHLEY, NC DOC DIRECTOR and CAPTAIN MESSENBURG
Michael McNeill v. Mike Ruffin
as 09-7453
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MCNEILL
Defendant - Appellee:
MIKE RUFFIN
Michael McNeill v. Officer Germany
as 09-7343
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MCNEILL
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER 1ST MR. GERMANY and UNIT MANAGER MR. WALL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
