Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01472
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Varidesk LLC v. Lumi Legend Corporation et al
as 3:2017cv00904
Plaintiff:
Varidesk LLC
Defendant:
Lumi Legend Corporation, Innovative Office Products LLC, Ergotech Group LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
BSG Tech LLC v. Monoprice, Inc.
as 2:2015cv01151
Plaintiff:
BSG Tech LLC
Defendant:
Monoprice, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - FILE CONSOLIDATED WITH LEAD CASE 15-1304 (FAB)
as 3:2015cv01305
Plaintiff:
Ingeniador, LLC
Defendant:
Monoprice, Inc. and Blucora, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Ingeniador, LLC v. Crutchfield Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv01304
Plaintiff:
Ingeniador, LLC
Defendant:
Crutchfield Corporation and Crutchfield New Media, L.L.C.
Consolidated Defendant:
Monoprice, Inc., Blucora, Inc. and Zazzle, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Kreative Power, LLC v. Monoprice, Inc.
as 5:2014cv02991
Plaintiff:
Kreative Power, LLC
Defendant:
Monoprice, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Gibson Brands Inc v. Monoprice Inc et al
as 5:2014cv01264
Defendant:
Does and Monoprice Inc
Plaintiff:
Gibson Brands Inc
Sapphire Dolphin LLC v. Monoprice Inc.
as 1:2014cv00255
Plaintiff:
Sapphire Dolphin LLC
Defendant:
Monoprice Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Ideative Product Ventures, Inc. v. Monoprice, Inc.
as 4:2014cv00022
Defendant:
Monoprice, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ideative Product Ventures, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
KLIPSCH GROUP, INC. et al v. MONOPRICE, INC.
as 1:2013cv00437
Plaintiff:
AUDIO PRODUCTS INTERNATIONAL, CORP. and KLIPSCH GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
MONOPRICE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
