Cases 11 - 20 of 42,501
WILKINSON et al v. City of Dayton Ohio et al
as 3:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA WILKINSON, Keeley Nelson, Darlene Guynn and others
Defendant:
City of Dayton Ohio, Kamron Afzal, Officer Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mooring v. American Economy Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
Ashley Mooring
Defendant:
American Economy Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
MOORE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION v. META PLATFORMS, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00490
Plaintiff:
MOORE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION
Defendant:
META PLATFORMS, INC., FACEBOOK PAYMENTS, INC., SICULUS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Smith-Thomas v. Judges and Court Officials et al
as 1:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Cristyn Jeanette Smith-Thomas
Defendant:
Judges and Court Officials, David A Murphy, Courtney Weaks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Moore v. Misty Mackey
as 24-3534
Petitioner:
DANIEL MOORE
Respondent:
MISTY MACKEY, Acting Warden
In re: Moore Family Trust, et al
as 24-1515
Petitioner:
In re: MOORE FAMILY TRUST and SCOTT MICHAEL MOORE, Trustee
Bullivant v. United States Department of Agriculture, et al.
as 24-3693
Petitioner:
MELANIE BULLIVANT
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE and RANDY MOORE, United States Forest Service Chief
Clinton v. Pollard, et al.
as 24-3706
Plaintiff:
MARKEITH CLINTON
Defendant:
M. POLLARD, Warden, R. BUCKEL, Chief Deputy Warden, S. STEADMAN, Associate Warden and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00856
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act
Moore, Jr. v. Overtime Sports, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01103
Plaintiff:
Deandre Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
Overtime Sports, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
