Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Robinson v. Dunn et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2019cv00039
Plaintiff:
James L. Robinson
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Lynn Head, Ms. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirven v. Stanfill et al
as 2:2018cv01204
Plaintiff:
Loydale Kirven
Defendant:
MS Lewis, Curry County Detention Center, Sgt Stanfill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maynard v. Correction Corp of America et al
as 4:2017cv00517
Plaintiff:
John Charles Maynard
Defendant:
Correction Corp of America, Mr Ammon, Ms Wesson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Browner v. Fountain et al
as 3:2016cv00012
Plaintiff:
Antonio Browner
Defendant:
Lisa Fountain, Homer Bryson, Charles Mims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson v. Preckwinkle et al
as 1:2013cv08752
Plaintiff:
Tylon Hudson
Defendant:
Toni Preckwinkle, Tom Dart, K. Sankey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Colorado Department, et al
as 12-1071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ADRIAN M. HILL
Defendant - Appellee:
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS PAROLE BOARDS, MARK ROBERTS and others
John Baccus v. Bill Byar
as 11-7426
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ROOSEVELT BACCUS, a/k/a John Baccus
Defendant - Appellee:
BILL BYARS, Director of South Carolina Department of Corrections SCDC, NIKKI HALEY, Governor of South Carolina, JEAN HOEFER TOAL, Chief Justice of South Carolina Supreme Court and others
Baccus v. Byars et al
as 9:2011cv01280
Plaintiff:
John Baccus
Defendant:
Bill Byars, Nikki Haley, Jean Hoefer Toal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Twitty v. SCDC Medical Department Representatives et al
as 0:2010cv00392
Plaintiff:
Irving E Twitty
Defendant:
SCDC Medical Department Representatives, J Valpey, D Jacques and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
