Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Koplow v. Comcast Corporation, et al
as 17-1312
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LEE KOPLOW
Defendant - Appellee:
COMCAST CORPORATION, NEW ENGLAND CABLE NEWS, NATIONAL BROADCASTING CO., INC. and others
Koplow v. Comcast Corporation, et al
as 17-1297
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LEE KOPLOW
Defendant - Appellee:
COMCAST CORPORATION, NEW ENGLAND CABLE NEWS, NATIONAL BROADCASTING CO., INC. and others
Koplow v. Comcast Corporation, et al
as 17-1116
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID LEE KOPLOW
Defendant - Appellee:
COMCAST CORPORATION, NEW ENGLAND CABLE NEWS, NATIONAL BROADCASTING CO., INC. and others
Bazile v. Kelly et al
as 1:2016cv08393
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Bazile
Defendant:
David Kelly and NBC Television
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Minister Victor McGee et al v. The United States Government et al
as 2:2013cv00116
Defendant:
2010-1 CRE Venture LLC, ABC Television, Ms Connie Alarcon and others
Plaintiff:
Mr Billy Joe Johnson and Minister Victor McGee
PATOCK v. FOX NEWS et al
as 1:2011cv01910
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. PATOCK, SR.
Defendant:
NBC TELEVISION NETWORK, NBC NEWS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patock v. Fox News Network et al
as 4:2011cv00682
Plaintiff:
James Michael Patock, Sr.
Defendant:
Fox News Network, Washington Post, Arizona Republic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randle v. Vanwinkle et al
as 2:2011cv02849
Plaintiff:
Neverland Arniece Randle
Defendant:
Robert Vanwinkle, Paramount Pictures, Dreamworks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bray v. ABC Television et al
as 2:2010cv01066
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Bray
Defendant:
ABC Television, NBC Television, Federal Reserve Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
William Russell v. DOJ, et al
as 10-55809
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM MARK RUSSELL
Defendant - Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
