Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01574
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Horner v. Warrior Sports, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv10716
Plaintiff:
Laura Horner
Defendant:
Warrior Sports, Inc. and New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. v. Converse Inc.
as 1:2014cv14715
Plaintiff:
New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.
Defendant:
Converse Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Olivistar, LLC v. New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00673
Defendant:
New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Olivistar, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc. v. Lagerfeld et al
as 1:2014cv03943
Plaintiff:
New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.
Defendant:
Karl Lagerfeld, Karl Lagerfeld B.V., Karl Lagerfeld Retail B.V. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Denimafia Inc. v. New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc
as 14-1156
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Denimafia Inc.
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Foot Locker, Inc., The Sports Authority, Inc., Famous Horse, Inc., DBA V.I.M. and others
WULFF V. NEW BALANCE ATHLETIC SHOE, INC.
as 1:2014cv00371
Defendant:
NEW BALANCE ATHLETIC SHOE, INC.
Plaintiff:
JAMES WULFF and LINDA WULFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
ArrivalStar S.A. et al v. New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.
as 1:2013cv20649
Plaintiff:
ArrivalStar S.A. and Melvino Technologies Limited
Defendant:
New Balance Athletic Shoe, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-16331
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
