Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Cody Etherton, et al v. City of Rainsville, et al
as 15-15147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CODY ETHERTON and HOPE ETHERTON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF RAINSVILLE, NICK JONES, BRANDON FREEMAN and others
Montgomery v. Jenkins et al
as 3:2015cv50098
Defendant:
Michael Evans, Kelly Herrick, Joseph Yurkovich and others
Plaintiff:
Wade Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks et al v. PGA Tour, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00489
Plaintiff:
William Michael Hicks , Kenneth Harms , Matthew Achatz and others
Defendant:
PGA Tour, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Etherton et al v. City of Rainsville et al
as 4:2014cv01832
Plaintiff:
Cody Etherton and Hope Etherton
Defendant:
City of Rainsville , Nick Jones , Brandon Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
A.M. Castle & Co.
as 4:2013mc02323
Plaintiff:
A.M. Castle & Co.
Respondent:
Alejandro Villamil , Chad Williams , Corbin Redd and others
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Payne v. Lewis et al
as 3:2012cv00415
Plaintiff:
Timothy Laneal Payne
Defendant:
Tyrone Lewis, Warden Matthews, Ivy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of
as 3:2011cv00969
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, Citizens Review Board on Police Practices, Pacific View Motel and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Calhoun v. San Diego, County of et al
as 3:2011cv00655
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
San Diego, County of, Pacific View Motel, Sicuia Dyer and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Calhoun v. County, San Diego et al
as 3:2010cv02489
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Defendant:
County, San Diego, Michael M Anello , San Diego Public Law Library and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Calhoun v. San Diego County et al
as 3:2010cv00522
Defendant:
San Diego County, William V. Gallo, Dana M. Sabraw and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce Derrick Calhoun
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
