Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Tate v. Jones
as 1:2023cv01428
Plaintiff:
Germarco Tate
Defendant:
Nick Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tate v. Jones
as 3:2023cv03748
Plaintiff:
Germarco Tate
Defendant:
Nick Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv25876
Plaintiff:
NICK JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Peaster Independent School District
as 4:2023cv00969
Plaintiff:
Nick Jones
Defendant:
Peaster Independent School District, Doug McCollough and Keith Scharnhorst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
D.A. v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2022cv00311
Plaintiff:
D. A.
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Josh Highberger, Brandon Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv32391
Plaintiff:
NICK JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv22959
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NICK JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDermet v. DIRECTV, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11322
Defendant:
Nick Jones, The DIRECTV Group, Inc., David Christopher and others
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party William McDermet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King v. Lake County et al
as 5:2017cv00052
Plaintiff:
Scotty King
Defendant:
Lake County, Lake County Sheriff's Department, Gary S. Borders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams Hicks, et al v. PGA Tour, Inc.
as 16-15370
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAMS MICHAEL HICKS, KENNETH HARMS, as Class Representative Plaintiffs and Individual Plaintiffs, MATTHEW ACHATZ and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PGA TOUR, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
