Cases 11 - 20 of 167
Bray v. Daniels
as 6:2023cv06066
Plaintiff:
Michael John Bray
Defendant:
Nathan Thomas Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fayetteville Public Library et al v. Crawford County, Arkansas et al
as 5:2023cv05086
Plaintiff:
Fayetteville Public Library, Eureka Springs Carnegie Public Library, Central Arkansas Library System and others
Defendant:
Crawford County, Arkansas, Chris Keith, Todd Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mahomes v. Watkins et al
as 4:2023cv00514
Plaintiff:
Lawrance Mahomes and Lawrance D Mahomes
Defendant:
Nathan Watkins, Brenda Gilliam and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bray v. Daniels
as 3:2023cv00123
Plaintiff:
Michael John Bray
Defendant:
Nathan Thomas Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv06036
Plaintiff:
Nathan L Owens
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
Owens v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2023cv00213
Plaintiff:
Nathan L Owens
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision
Bennings v. Elrod et al
as 6:2023cv06028
Plaintiff:
Wendell Brock Bennings
Defendant:
Chief Deputy Steven Elrod, Captain Joel Ware, Captain Belinda Cosgrove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chism v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv01106
Plaintiff:
Nathan H Chism
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, James Gibson, Joseph Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moss v. Yates
as 2:2022cv00206
Plaintiff:
Nathan James Moss
Defendant:
John Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hales v. Wakefield et al
as 4:2022cv01078
Plaintiff:
Nathan Hale and Nathan Hales
Defendant:
Robert Wakefield, M Dukes and Bowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
