Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 27
COLEMAN v. WARDEN
as 2:2018cv00197
Petitioner: NATHANIEL COLEMAN
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
In re: Nathaniel Coleman
as 17-2764
Petitioner: In re: NATHANIEL COLEMAN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL RE: PAROLEE Coleman
as 1:2016mc91371
Movant: Nathaniel Coleman
Cause Of Action: Motion for appointment of counsel for grand jury
Nathaniel Coleman v. United States Parole Commissio, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-2645
Plaintiff - Appellant: NATHANIEL COLEMAN
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION, ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
COLEMAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv01516
Petitioner: NATHANIEL COLEMAN
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Coleman v. Tetra Applied Technologies, L.P. et al
as 3:2015cv00332
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Coleman
Defendant: Tetra Applied Technologies, L.P. and Tetra Applied GP LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Coleman v. Jenkins
as 3:2015cv00633
Plaintiff: Nathaniel Coleman
Defendant: Lepher Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv03586
Petitioner: NATHANIEL COLEMAN
Respondent: U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION , U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL and J. HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
COLEMAN v. UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv03329
Petitioner: NATHANIEL COLEMAN
Respondent: UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION and JORDAN HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COLEMAN v. HOLLINGSWORTH We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00276
Petitioner: NATHANIEL COLEMAN
Respondent: J. HOLLINGSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?