Cases 11 - 20 of 45
David Meyers v. Sergeant Hafeez
as 23-6042
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT HAFEEZ, SERGEANT HUNT, OFFICER BARNES and others
David Meyers v. Todd Ishee
as 23-6041
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
TODD E. ISHEE, NCDPS Prisons Director, NCDPS PRISONS INTERSTATE COMPACT ADMINISTRATOR, Interstate Compact Administrator, SCOTLAND COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and others
David Meyers v. Ronnie Scott
as 23-6038
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIT MANAGER RONNIE SCOTT, WARDEN STEVEN JACOBS, SERGEANT DIAL and others
Lubrano et al v. Morgenstern et al
as 1:2022cv04987
Plaintiff:
Giuseppe Lubrano
Defendant:
Esther Mickey Morgenstern, Eric Gonzales, NYC Mayor Eric Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MEYERS v. RONNIE SCOTT et al
as 1:2022cv00457
Plaintiff:
DAVID MYERS and DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
UNIT MANAGER RONNIE SCOTT, WARDEN STEVEN JACOBS, SGT. DIAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickson v. Barnes
as 1:2022cv04033
Plaintiff:
Simone Dickson
Defendant:
Correction Officer Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Martin v. Locklear et al
as 5:2022ct03162
Plaintiff:
Javis Martin
Defendant:
Mary Locklear, Lt. Odom, Correctional Officer Locklear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickson v. Barnes
as 1:2022cv00423
Plaintiff:
Simone Dickson
Defendant:
Officer Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRIGHT v. BULLET, et al
as 1:2022cv00301
Plaintiff:
JACKIE BRIGHT and Jackie Lamar Bright
Defendant:
LT. BULLET, OFFICER MCNIAL, OFFICER BARN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bright v. Bullet et al
as 5:2022ct03133
Plaintiff:
Jackie Bright and Jackie Lamar Bright
Defendant:
Lt. Bullet, Officer McNial, Officer Barn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
