Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Howard v. New York State Division of Parole et al
as 1:2015cv05317
Defendant:
Commissioner Anthony J. Annucci, Supervisor Linda Jeffries, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Frazier v. Watkins
as 1:2015cv04894
Petitioner:
Garry Frazier, Jr.
Respondent:
Correction Officer Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Driver v. Waslewski et al
as 1:2015cv04041
Plaintiff:
Wilbur Driver
Defendant:
Martin Chatys, Officer Waslewski, Officer Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Floyd v. Watkins
as 2:2014cv01775
Plaintiff:
William Patrick Floyd
Defendant:
Officer Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JONES v. LOMBARDO et al
as 1:2014cv03739
Plaintiff:
MALCOLM JONES
Defendant:
DONALD J. LOMBARDO, GARY G. SCHAFFER, JOHN D. MAHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harsey v. Marzol et al
as 3:2013cv02036
Plaintiff:
David Douglas Harsey
Defendant:
Robert Marzol, P Dufault, Officer Watkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gibson v. City of Chicago, The et al
as 1:2013cv03273
Defendant:
City of Chicago, The and Officer Watkins
Plaintiff:
Donald J Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
La Toya Hicks v. Los Angeles Police Department Pacific Division et al
as 2:2013cv01596
Defendant:
Thomas Corte, ERA Matilla Realty, Thomas Ennis and others
Plaintiff:
La Toya Hicks
Bird v. Boardman et al
as 1:2012cv00631
Plaintiff:
Valerie Bird
Defendant:
Inspector Bruce Boardman, Hays County Sherriff's Office of Internal Affair, Officer Lozano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hood v. McClelland et al
as 3:2011cv00854
Defendant:
Lt McClelland, David Mitchell, Officer Watkins and others
Plaintiff:
Richard L Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
