Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Felix et al v. Gotham Real Estate Corp. et al
as 1:2012cv04559
Defendant:
"John Doe" #1-10 and "Jane Doe" # 1-10, Alan H. Bernstein, Peter Brook and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Felix and Marise Pierre Louis Felix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morgan v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv00704
Defendant:
Michael R. Bloomberg, City of New York, Raymond W. Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Omeil Novado Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dugas v. Young et al
as 7:2011cv00417
Defendant:
Lt. S. Buchanon, D. Hammond, John Doe Officer Eight and others
Plaintiff:
Greg Lee Dugas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowden et al v. Town of Tonawanda, New York et al
as 1:2011cv00392
Plaintiff:
Billy C. Bowden and Lymuel Bowden
Defendant:
Town of Tonawanda, New York , Michelle Janczak , Paul A. Yacono and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stein v. City of San Ramon et al
as 3:2010cv00786
Plaintiff:
Robert Stein
Defendant:
City of San Ramon, County of Contra Costa, Officer One and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phelon v. Hamman et al
as 4:2009cv03393
Plaintiff:
Kenneth D. Phelon
Defendant:
Jeremy D. Hamman, Officer One, Officer Two and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Phiffer v. Doe Sheriff et al
as 3:2009cv00285
Plaintiff:
Earl D. Phiffer
Defendant:
Jon Doe Sheriff, Jon Doe Officer One, Jon Doe Officer Two and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huertas v. City of Camden, et al
as 08-2042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HECTOR L. HUERTAS
Defendant - Appellee:
7 ELEVEN INC, 75-1085131 (FEIN)
Defendant:
CITY OF CAMDEN, MELVIN R. PRIMAS, City of Camden C.E.O., GWENDOLYN FAISON, Mayor and others
Austin v. LaVergne Police Department et al
as 3:2008cv00040
Plaintiff:
Millard Paul Austin
Defendant:
LaVergne Police Department, City of LaVergne, Ted W. Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
