Cases 11 - 20 of 25
WILSON v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 4:2020cv00018
Defendant:
INDIANA UNIVERSITY SOUTHEAST and STATE OF INDIANA
Plaintiff:
NICOLE OWENS WILSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Wilson v. McGinty
as 3:2020cv00015
Plaintiff:
Claude Owen Wilson
Defendant:
Michael McGinty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Williamsburg City / James City County
as 3:2020cv00013
Plaintiff:
Claude Owen Wilson
Defendant:
Williamsburg City / James City County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. T-Mobile USA Corporation / Metro PCS Incorporated
as 3:2020cv00014
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Corporation / Metro PCS Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Claude Owen Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Breckon
as 3:2019cv00913
Plaintiff:
Claude Owen Wilson
Defendant:
J. Breckon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Bezrukov (Farnham)
as 19-3613
Defendant:
Sergiy Bezrukov, AKA John Butler, AKA Thomas Paris, AKA Christopher Riley, AKA Chris Riley, AKA Kerry P. (Patrick) Clancy, AKA Robert Foss, AKA Owen Wilson
Defendant / Appellant:
Mark Farnham, AKA Jaxon Hollienan
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Wilson v. T-Mobile USA Corporation et al
as 3:2019cv00403
Defendant:
Metro PCS Incorporated and T-Mobile USA Corporation
Plaintiff:
Claude Owen Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. United States of America for the Eastern District of Virginia
as 3:2019cv00230
Plaintiff:
Claude Owen Wilson
Defendant:
United States of America for the Eastern District of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Woods
as 3:2016cv00578
Plaintiff:
Claude Owen Wilson
Defendant:
David Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ardito v. NBC Universal, Inc.
as 14-1061
Plaintiff:
Chivalry Film Productions
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Ardito
Defendant - Appellee:
NBC Universal, Inc., Tribeca Productions Inc., Library of Congress and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
