Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Pioli v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv04567
Plaintiff:
Leonore Pioli
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Bliss et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2012cv03966
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bliss , Olly Cantell , Danielle Carter and others
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson and Johnson Services Inc , Thomas P Schmalried M D A Professional Corporation and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Patrick Bliss et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 2:2012cv07648
Plaintiff:
Patrick Bliss, Olly Cantell, Danielle Carter and others
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, Does, Johnson and Johnson Services Inc and others
Habibo Jama v. USA, et al
as 10-35822
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HABIBO A. JAMA
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SEATTLE, TODD HARRIS, MATT NESS and others
Pioli v. Pfizer Inc
as 2:2010cv02004
Plaintiff:
Anita Irene Pioli
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Booth v. Pioli
as 3:2010cv05204
Plaintiff:
Marvin L. Booth
Defendant:
John C. Pioli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jama v. United States of America et al
as 2:2009cv00256
Plaintiff:
Habibo A Jama and Habibo A Jama
Defendant:
United States of America, City of Seattle, City of Tukwila and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Heeb et al v. The Republic of Argentina
as 1:2007cv10656
Plaintiff:
Enrique Sebastian Pa Minetti, Plaintiffs, Alberto Gillermo Hillcoat and others
Interested Party:
Profesion+Auge AFJP S.A., Banco Central de la Republica Argentina, Origenes AFJP S.A. and others
Defendant:
The Republic of Argentina
Appellant:
Administracion Nacional de Seguridad Social
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
