Cases 11 - 20 of 99
Jennifer Landeros, et al v. Samuel Schafer, et al
as 22-16866
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JENNIFER LANDEROS, B. M. L., guardian ad litem Jennifer Landeros, J. J. L., guardian ad litem Jennifer Landeros and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMUEL SCHAFER, STEVEN HOLSTAD, JUSTIN PARKER and others
SCOTT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23817
Plaintiff:
PATRICK SCOTT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Chieng Fen Kelly Chi v. Patrick Scott Payne et al
as 5:2022cv01923
Plaintiff:
Chieng Fen Kelly Chi
Defendant:
Patrick Scott Payne, Carlina Willette Payne and Does 1 to 10
Cartwright v. Oregon Department of Corrections
as 3:2022cv01510
Petitioner:
Patrick Scott Cartwright
Respondent:
Oregon Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Future Motion, Inc.
as FLM/8:22-CV-01748
Plaintiff:
Scott and Patrick Scott
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Scott v. Future Motion, Inc.
as 8:2022cv01748
Plaintiff:
Patrick Scott
Defendant:
Future Motion, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Saxena v. Gino & Carlos, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv08980
Plaintiff:
Captain Grant Mitchell Saxena
Defendant:
Gino & Carlos, Inc., Patrick Michael Lawlor, Marco Rossi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
SCOTT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43660
Plaintiff:
KEVIN PATRICK SCOTT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lewis v. Andrews et al
as 2:2021cv00057
Defendant:
William Patrick Scott, William Straughn, Jeremy Andrews and others
Plaintiff:
David E Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TRAYERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv21620
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PATRICK SCOTT TRAYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
