Cases 11 - 20 of 38
De Matos et al v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts etal
as 1:2013cv12880
Plaintiff:
Justin De Matos
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Massachusetts State Police, Scott Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolf v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2013cv00524
Plaintiff:
Paul Wolf
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Beard v. Wolf et al
as 2:2013cv04772
Plaintiff:
Janice Beard
Defendant:
Crane Paul Wolf and Daniel Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wolf v. Dostle et al
as 4:2013cv01645
Plaintiff:
David Paul Wolf
Defendant:
Susan Dostle, Tawona L. Smith, Melony Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Does 1-98 et al v. Bois Schiller & Flexner LLP et al
as 9:2013cv80146
Plaintiff:
Does 1-98 and Paul Wolf
Defendant:
Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP, Doe 1-8 and Roderick Hills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wolf v. Owens et al
as 4:2013cv00227
Plaintiff:
David Paul Wolf
Defendant:
Rissi L Owens, Brad Livingston and Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DOES 1-98 et al v. BOIS SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP et al
as 1:2012cv01855
Plaintiff:
DOES 1-98 and PAUL WOLF
Defendant:
BOIS SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP and DOE 1-8
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
DOES et al v. BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
as 1:2012cv01751
Defendant:
BOIES SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
Plaintiff:
DOES and PAUL WOLF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Wolf v. Texas Department Criminal Justice et al
as 4:2012cv02424
Plaintiff:
David Paul Wolf
Defendant:
Texas Department Criminal Justice, Brad Livingston, Fausto Avila and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: FAILURE TO COMPLY
as 1:2012mc00053
In Re:
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH CONTINUING LEGAL EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS AND/OR NONPAYMENT OF ATTORNEY REGISTRATION FEES
Respondent:
PHILIP LYNN CARSON, EDWIN HENRY FISHER, JR., TODD EDWIN HAINES and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
