Cases 11 - 20 of 89
USA v. Pedro Garcia Vasquez
as 21-12288
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
PEDRO ANTONIO GARCIA VASQUEZ
Pedro Arreola-Garcia v. Merrick Garland
as 20-72527
Petitioner:
PEDRO ARREOLA-GARCIA
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General and MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
VAMOS, Concertacion Ciudadana Inc. et al v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2020cv01426
Plaintiff:
Alice Sparks/Horner, Maria de Lourdes Guzman-Rivera, Pedro Muniz-Garcia and others
Defendant:
Coomonwealth of Puerto Rico, Walter Velez, State Electoral Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young, et al v. Ledet, et al
as 2:2020cv02165
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cornelius Young, III, John Fitzgerald Bonvillain, Jr., Chad Knox and others
Defendant:
Mitch Dupre, Stephen Bergeron, Rhonda Ledet and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARCIA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv61634
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
PEDRO M GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Pedro Guerrero-Garcia
as 20-40190
Defendant / Appellant:
PEDRO GUERRERO-GARCIA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Pedro Zuniga Garcia
as 20-20083
Defendant / Appellant:
PEDRO ZUNIGA GARCIA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
GARCIA v. CERBONE et al
as 2:2019cv19498
Plaintiff:
Pedro Tayun Garcia
Defendant:
Nicholas Paul Cerbone and Thuman Trucking, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pedro Rodriguez-Garcia v. William Barr
as 19-71735
Petitioner:
PEDRO RODRIGUEZ-GARCIA, AKA Carlos A. Contreras, AKA Pedro Garcia, AKA Pedro Rodriguez, AKA Pedro Rodriguez Garcia
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
USA v. Pedro Rodriguez-Garcia
as 19-50575
Defendant / Appellant:
PEDRO RODRIGUEZ-GARCIA, also known as Pedro Garcia-Rodriguez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
