Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Arthur et al v. Trojan Horse, Ltd. et al
as 1:2012cv03156
Plaintiff:
Henry R. Arthur , Kenneth Currence , Salvador Cordero and others
Defendant:
Trojan Horse, Ltd. , Glen Burnie Hauling, Inc. and Brian Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv07469
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
James Brooks v. Howard Arthur, Sr.
as 11-1899
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES BROOKS and DONALD HAMLETTE
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL ST. JOHN
Defendant - Appellee:
HOWARD R. ARTHUR, SR., In his individual capacity and RANDAL MITCHELL
Arthur v. Captiol Region Medical Services
as 2:2010cv04209
Plaintiff:
John R. Arthur
Defendant:
Captiol Region Medical Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arthur v. Astrue
as 4:2009cv01886
Plaintiff:
Joseph R. Arthur
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
James Brooks v. Howard Arthur, Sr.
as 09-1551
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES BROOKS, DONALD HAMLETTE and SAMUEL ST. JOHN
Defendant - Appellee:
HOWARD R. ARTHUR, SR., In his individual capacity and RANDAL MITCHELL
Parker et al v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2009cv00002
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Parker and Tim Hargrave
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Samuel White, P.C., Fabio Crichigno and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brooks v. Arthur et al
as 6:2008cv00028
Plaintiff:
James Brooks
Defendant:
Howard R. Arthur, Sr. and Randal W. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
St. John v. Arthur et al
as 6:2008cv00030
Plaintiff:
Samuel St. John
Defendant:
Howard R. Arthur, Sr. and Randal W. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hamlette v. Arthur et al
as 6:2008cv00029
Plaintiff:
Donald Hamlette
Defendant:
Howard R. Arthur, Sr. and Randal W. Mitchell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
