Cases 11 - 20 of 175
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
REVIS v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv09215
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN REVIS
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Demby v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2023cv00380
Plaintiff:
Troy Cortez Demby
Defendant:
State of Nevada, Aaron Ford, Breitenbach and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kristy Revis v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 23-2045
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Kristy Hill Revis
Defendant / Appellant:
DST Systems, Inc.
Kristy Revis v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 23-1714
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Kristy Hill Revis
Defendant / Appellant:
DST Systems, Inc.
Revis v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
George Revis
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Revis v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00087
Plaintiff:
Linda Revis
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Gabrielle Aguirre et al v. Capital One Bank USA N.A. et al
as 8:2023cv00128
Plaintiff:
GABRIELLE AGUIRRE, REYNA ALEMAN DE RAMIREZ, JENNIFER ALMEYDA and others
Defendant:
Capital One Bank (USA) N.A., Does 1 through 100 Inclusive and Capital One Bank USA N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Revis v. United States of America DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE CASE - SEE 7:23-CV-87-FL
as 4:2023cv00019
Plaintiff:
Linda Revis
Defendant:
United States of America
(PC) Revis v. Moore et al
as 1:2022cv01189
Plaintiff:
Andre L. Revis
Defendant:
J. Moore, David Alvarez, R. Guembe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
