Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Ramada Worldwide Inc. v. Petersburg Regency, LLC et al
as 2:2013mc00011
Plaintiff: Ramada Worldwide Inc.
Defendant: Petersburg Regency, LLC and Robert Harmon
Harmon v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc et al
as 6:2012cv02505
Plaintiff: Robert Harmon
Defendant: Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Felix et al v. BP Products North America, Inc.
as 3:2012cv00110
Plaintiff: Elsa Felix , Timothy Frost , Judy Gamble and others
Petitioner: Breanne McMillian
Defendant: BP Products North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Steven Hypolite v. Board of Parole Hearings, et al
as 11-17964
Plaintiff - Appellant: STEVEN HYPOLITE
Defendant - Appellee: BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, SANDRA BRYSON and ROBERT HARMON
Steven Hypolite v. Board of Parole Hearings, et al
as 11-17141
Plaintiff - Appellant: STEVEN HYPOLITE
Defendant - Appellee: BOARD OF PAROLE HEARINGS, SANDRA BRYSON and ROBERT HARMON
Hypolite v. Board of Parole Hearings, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00990
Plaintiff: Steven Hypolite
Defendant: Board of Parole Hearings, Sandra Bryson and Robert Harmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAMADA WOLRDWIDE, INC. v. PETERSBURG REGENCY, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv04092
Plaintiff: RAMADA WOLRDWIDE, INC.
Defendant: PETERSBURG REGENCY, LLC and ROBERT HARMON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robert Kerson, et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al
as 10-80089
Plaintiff - Respondent: ROBERT KERSON, FREDERICK ROZO, MICHAEL FRANCIS AYERS and others
Defendant - Petitioner: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG SEMICONDUCTOR, INC. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC.
Robert Kerson, et al v. LG Display Co., Ltd., et al
as 10-80087
Plaintiff - Respondent: ROBERT KERSON, FREDERICK ROZO, MICHAEL FRANCIS AYERS and others
Defendant - Petitioner: LG DISPLAY CO., LTD., LG DISPLAY AMERICA, INC., AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION and others
Ashker et al v. Schwarzenegger et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv05796
Plaintiff: Todd Ashker and Danny Troxell
Defendant: Arnold Schwarzenegger, Mathew Cate, Roderick Q. Hickman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?