Cases 11 - 20 of 235
Smith v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02690
Plaintiff:
Gerald Ronald Smith, Sr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. Locker et al
as 5:2023cv00881
Plaintiff:
Ronald Smith
Defendant:
Robert Locker, Guadalupe County, Hunter Saenz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Smith v. Alexander et al
as 1:2023cv02348
Plaintiff:
David Ronald Smith
Defendant:
Kimberly A. Alexander, Kimberbly Brock, Kimberly Brock and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Smith v. Bexar County et al
as 5:2023cv00623
Plaintiff:
Ronald Smith
Defendant:
Bexar County and Ramiro Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Nkrumah et al v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv00302
Plaintiff:
Kwame Nkrumah, Shannon Nkrumah, Lula Woodson and others
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, City of New Haven, New Haven Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. GlaxoSmithKline LLC et al
as 3:2023cv10970
Plaintiff:
Ronald Smith
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline LLC, GlaxoSmithKline Holdings (Americas) Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Ronald Smith
as 23-3022
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
RONALD SMITH
United States of America v. Smith
as 22-3033
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Ronald Smith
Smith v. Wiger et al
as 2:2022cv01654
Plaintiff:
Ronald Smith, Jr and Ronald A Smith, Jr
Defendant:
C Wiger, G Lyons, J Triplett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
