Cases 11 - 20 of 63
Burciaga v. Red Robin International, Inc
as 1:2021cv01772
Plaintiff:
Ms. Rachelle Johnson, Rachelle Johnson, Ashley Bond and others
Defendant:
Red Robin International, Inc and Red Robin Frederick County, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Moulay Tidriri v. Board of Regents, et al
as 20-3265
Defendant / Appellee:
Zhijun Wu, Howard Levine, Roger Maddux and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Moulay Tidriri
Moulay Tidriri v. Board of Regents, et al
as 20-3240
Defendant / Appellee:
Zhijun Wu, Howard Levine, Jennifer Davidson, also known as Newman and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Moulay Tidriri
JOHNSON v. ALLERGAN, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv08685
Defendant:
ALLERGAN, INC., INAMED CORPORATION, ALLERGAN PLC and others
In Re:
IN RE: ALLERGAN BIOCELL TEXTURED BREAST IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
RACHEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01162
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv87204
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RACHELE JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv12327
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RACHEL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Centor, Inc.
as 5:2019cv02622
Defendant:
Centor, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rachel Johnson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00321
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moler v. Stovall et al
as 6:2019cv00206
Respondent:
Rachel Johnson, Ns. Parsons-Gould, Tara Cimarossa and others
Petitioner:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
