Cases 11 - 20 of 640
Bridgewater et al v. Resident Manager Josephinum et al
as 2:2023cv01597
Plaintiff:
Keywanie S Bridgewater
Defendant:
Resident Manager Josephinum, Jamine Hampton, Nick Antonucc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv19814
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO REA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
REA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv02264
Plaintiff:
CHARLES REA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rice v. Cecil County, MD et al
as 1:2023cv02344
Plaintiff:
Crystal Rice
Defendant:
Cecil County, Prime Care Medical Inc, Sheriff Scott A. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv22983
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Rea v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
as 5:2023cv00952
Plaintiff:
Robin Rea
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Julian Pulido v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2023cv06266
Plaintiff:
Julian Pulido
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, Ngozi Chukwuemek, NP, Trini Bui, NP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv20604
Plaintiff:
CHARLES REA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rea v. Complete Maintenance Company
as 4:2023cv00158
Plaintiff:
Jeslyn Rea, Michael Newfield and Erik Orozco
Defendant:
Complete Maintenance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
