Cases 11 - 19 of 19
FLOWERS v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv01905
Plaintiff:
RICHARD FLOWERS
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC, EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC and EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Colgate Palmolive Co v. Tandem Industries, et al
as 10-4163
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COLGATE PALMOLIVE CO
Defendant - Appellee:
TANDEM INDUSTRIES, GYPS MARKET, JAMES LAWSON and others
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD FLOWER
Flowers v. Glowing Report Ltd. et al
as 1:2010cv06629
Plaintiff:
Richard Flowers
Defendant:
Glowing Report Ltd., Hudson Productions, Ltd., The Weinstein Company LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Flowers v. Allen (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2010cv00579
Plaintiff:
Richard Flowers
Defendant:
Richard F. Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Colgate Palmolive Co v. Tandem Industries, et al
as 09-2390
Plaintiff - Appellee:
COLGATE PALMOLIVE CO
Defendant - Appellee:
TANDEM INDUSTRIES, GYPS MARKET, JAMES LAWSON and others
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD FLOWER
Flowers v. Johns
as 5:2008hc02102
Petitioner:
Richard Flowers
Respondent:
Tracy Johns
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Local 533 et al v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
as 3:2008cv00169
Plaintiff:
International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Local 533, International Brotherhood Of Teamsters Local 631, Richard Flowers and others
Respondent:
United Parcel Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Flowers et al v. Eckerd Corporation
as 8:2007cv01934
Plaintiff:
Ruth Flowers and Richard Flowers
Defendant:
Eckerd Corporation and Eckerd Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Colgate-Palmolive Company v. Tandem Industries et al
as 3:2007cv01709
Plaintiff:
Colgate-Palmolive Company and Colgate-Palmolive Company
Defendant:
Tandem Industries, Gyp's Market, James Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
