Cases 11 - 20 of 85
Richards v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv00351
Plaintiff:
Renee S Richards
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Ducey, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POPE v. WALMART et al
as 2:2021cv20479
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY POPE
Defendant:
WALMART, RODNEY M HUNTER, JR., ROE(S) RICHARD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Richards v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv00865
Defendant:
L Brown, Unknown Livingston, Unknown Jimenez and others
Plaintiff:
Renee S Richards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. Shinn et al
as 2:2021cv00263
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Renee S Richards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RICHARDS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv03994
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER S RICHARDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RICHARDS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv18399
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC S RICHARDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JACK-KELLY et al v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2020cv02998
Defendant:
CITY OF ANDERSON, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF ANDERSON POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff:
CHRIS A. KELLY, S. RICHARD JACK and KELLY JACK-KELLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02703
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
RICHARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv74612
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S RICHARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
