Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Bennett v. State of Ms
as 3:2017cv00468
Plaintiff:
Dillon W. Bennett
Defendant:
State of Ms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Patterson v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2016cv00199
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Patterson
Defendant:
State of Mississippi , State of MS Department of Corrections, Marshall Fisher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. State of Ms et al
as 3:2016cv00046
Plaintiff:
Tammy Edwards
Defendant:
State of Ms, Jackson, Mississippi, Rankin County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hyde v. State of MS et al
as 3:2016cv00019
Petitioner:
Kenneth Troy Hyde
Respondent:
State of MS and Attorney General for the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Everette Jr. v. Office of States Attorney et al
as 8:2015cv03818
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Everette Jr.
Defendant:
Office of States Attorney, States Attorney Scott Shellenberger and Asst. States Attorney Ms. Suzzane Cohen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FLYNN v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2015cv00697
Petitioner:
DONALD FLYNN
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MS. KANE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rhodes v. State of MS et al
as 3:2014cv00764
Plaintiff:
Travon R. Rhodes
Defendant:
State of Ms and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rhodes v. State of MS et al
as 1:2014cv00181
Petitioner:
Travon R. Rhodes
Respondent:
State of MS and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Glass v. Bryant et al
as 3:2013cv00662
Plaintiff:
Robert Glass
Defendant:
Phil Bryant and State of Ms.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
BEY v. ROZUM et al
as 2:2013cv00325
Petitioner:
BABAESU BEY
Respondent:
GERALD ROZUM, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MS. LINDA L. KELIY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
