Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Walker v. Scherbarth, et al
as 16-1233
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE WALKER
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID SCHERBARTH, in individual and official capacities, WESLEY WILSON, in individual and official capacities, FRANKIE NICKELS, in individual and official capacities and others
Salerno v. Anderson et al
as 1:2016cv00189
Plaintiff:
Fox Salerno
Defendant:
Jennifer Anderson, Castellano, John Chapdelaine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sale v. Anderson et al
as 1:2015cv02728
Plaintiff:
Joseph Fox Sale
Defendant:
Jennifer Anderson, Castellano, John Chapdelaine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fresquez v. Webber et al
as 1:2015cv02384
Plaintiff:
Leroy D. Fresquez
Defendant:
Jim Webber, Paul Hallenbeck, John Chapdelaine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scherbarth v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv06596
Plaintiff:
Ruth Scherbarth
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walker v. Scherbarth et al
as 1:2015cv00823
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Walker
Defendant:
David Scherbarth, David (I) Scherbarth, Wesley Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mardis v. Three John Does of D.R.D.C., et al
as 15-1123
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEXANDER S. MARDIS, Propria Persona
Defendant - Appellee:
THREE JOHN DOES OF D.R.D.C., in their individual and official capacities, 1 JOHN DOE INMATE AT D.R.D.C., in his individual capacity, ASSOCIATE WARDEN SCHERBARTH, S.C.F, in their Official Capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv10037
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv14833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mardis v. D.R.D.C., et al
as 1:2014cv02761
Plaintiff:
Alexander Mardis
Defendant:
James Falk, Hoffman, Rendon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
