Cases 11 - 20 of 35
BROTHERS v. PSP et al
as 2:2019cv01303
Defendant:
NESHANNOCK POLICE, TPR. SHAWN KING, TPR. ROMAN SHABLESKY and others
Plaintiff:
TIYONDA BROTHERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
King v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2019cv05250
Plaintiff:
Mr. Shawn King
Defendant:
The City of New York, John 1-10 Doe, Ryan O'cconnor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King et al v. University of Central Florida Foundation, Inc. et al
as 6:2019cv01164
Defendant:
University of Central Florida Foundation, Inc., Dale D. Dennany and Timber Creek High School Foundation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Randall Scott King and Shawn King
Petitioner:
Timber Creek High School
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. SMITH et al
as 3:2018cv00175
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT BARRY SMITH and CRAIG PETTULLA
Plaintiff:
SHAWN KING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Polly v. Pima, County of et al
as 4:2016cv00358
Defendant:
Pima, County of , Pima County Sheriff's Department , Elliot Lyle and others
Plaintiff:
Lillian M Polly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shawn King v. Secretary, Florida Department
as 16-10342
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHAWN KING
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Shawn King v. Florida Department of Correcti, et al
as 15-15492
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHAWN KING
Respondent - Appellee:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Simpson v. Hendersonville, Tennessee, The City of et al
as 3:2015cv00848
Plaintiff:
Michael Simpson
Defendant:
Hendersonville, Tennessee, The City of, Shawn King, Monica Lynch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bartley v. Pruitt et al
as 5:2015cv03153
Plaintiff:
Patrick Leon Bartley
Defendant:
Tyler Pruitt, Joe Rucker, Shawn King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyles v. Shawnee County Jail et al
as 5:2014cv03157
Plaintiff:
Dominique Lee Boyles
Defendant:
Shawnee County Jail, Brian Cole, Shawn King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
