Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Wood et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv13329
Plaintiff:
Sherry Wood and James Wood
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Broadhead v. Headley et al
as 4:2013cv02276
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Joseph Headley, Carter Davenport, Sherry Wood and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 4
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Shoebridge et al
as 4:2013cv01861
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
John Shoebridge, Lavolefiso Jones, Steven Tish and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney and staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00609
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mitchell v. Clayton et al
as 2:2013cv11620
Plaintiff:
Gary Mitchell
Defendant:
Jerry Clayton, Mark Ptaszek, Sherry Woods and others
Broadhead v. Shoebridge et al
as 4:2013cv00148
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
John Shoebridge, Jonathan Ragan, S. Tish and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood et al v. Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA et al
as 8:2011cv02293
Plaintiff:
James Wood and Sherry Wood
Defendant:
Weltman, Weinberg & Reis Co., LPA and LVNV Funding, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Calvin Wood v. Greg Wood
as 10-1946
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN W. WOOD, Cherokee
Defendant - Appellee:
GREG V. WOOD, Cherokee, and his wife whose name is, UNKNOWN, and, JON C. WOOD, Cherokee, and his wife and others
Wood v. Wood et al
as 3:2010cv00122
Plaintiff:
Calvin W. Wood
Defendant:
Greg V. Wood, Unknown, Jon C. Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
