Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Banks v. Platt et al
as 5:2015cv03093
Plaintiff:
Albert Dewayne Banks
Defendant:
David R. Platt, Steven L. Opat, Glen F. Virden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
John Prather v. Sprint Communications, Inc., et al
as 14-17434
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Applicant-in-intervention - Appellant:
JOHN C. PRATHER
Defendant - Appellee:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC., FKA Sprint Nextel Corporation and SPRINT PCS
Emilio v. Sprint Spectrum L.P.
as 14-732
Petitioner - Appellee:
Vincent Emilio, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Respondent - Appellant:
Sprint Spectrum L.P., DBA Sprint PCS
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Sprint Communications, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv00962
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
Sprint Communications, Inc. and Sprint PCS
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Hammond v. Richardson et al
as 1:2013cv04962
Plaintiff:
Reginald Adae Hammond, II
Defendant:
Yolanda Richardson, Sonia Hemmings, Sprint PCS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv61424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Emilio v. Sprint Spectrum L.P.
as 12-1223
Petitioner - Appellant:
Vincent Emilio, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Respondent - Appellee:
Sprint Spectrum L.P., DBA Sprint PCS
Spencer v. Sprint PCS, et al
as 4:2011cv00340
Defendant:
Herman Miller Inc and Sprint PCS
Plaintiff:
Willie Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00911
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Calderon-Lopez v. American Telephone & Telegraph, et al
as 10-1032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICARDO J. CALDERON-LOPEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
AT&T CORPORATION, SPRINT PCS, OFFICE MAX, INC. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
