Cases 11 - 20 of 70
(HC) Bradley v. Price
as 2:2023cv00527
Petitioner:
Steven Bradley
Respondent:
Branden Price
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hodges v. Hartman et al
as 3:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Steven Bradley Hodges
Defendant:
Warden Hartman, Marangi, Justin Pope and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodges v. Dyer et al
as 3:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Steven Bradley Hodges
Defendant:
Officer Dyer, Warden Henley, Nevada Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Ahmed et al
as 3:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
Steven Bradley Powell
Defendant:
Failsel Vakil Ahmed, Nurse Brown, Ms Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mell v. Thompson
as 1:2023cv00098
Petitioner:
Steven Bradley Mell
Respondent:
R. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Steven Mell v. USA
as 23-1082
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN BRADLEY MELL
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BRADLEY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv24987
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BRADLEY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Reynolds et al v. United States Government et al
as 7:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Save Our Children Truth Commission, Melody Rodgers, Malachi Chapman and others
Defendant:
United States Government, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Dana Davis, Lora Byers, Kimberly Vifinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
USA v. Steven Powell
as 22-30140
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
STEVEN BRADLEY POWELL
GIBSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11582
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BRADLEY GIBSON and STEVEN BRADLEY GIBSON, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
