Cases 11 - 20 of 157
James Logan v. J. Godwin, et al
as 22-14171
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ALEXANDER LOGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. GODWIN, T. DYKES, P. WHITE and others
Turner et al v. Lam Research Corporation
as 1:2022cv01237
Plaintiff:
Gary T. Turner and Ana Maria Turner
Defendant:
Lam Research Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Robert Turner v. USA
as 22-2912
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT T. TURNER
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Turner v. Wolfe
as 5:2022cv00197
Petitioner:
Robert T. Turner
Respondent:
R. M. Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Turner v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00831
Plaintiff:
Chyanne T. Turner
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
LOGAN v. GODWIN et al
as 3:2022cv09565
Plaintiff:
JAMES ALEXANDER LOGAN
Defendant:
GODWIN, T DYKES, P WHITE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Saul
as 3:2022cv00527
Plaintiff:
Judith T Turner
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Glenn Turner v. Gary Boughton, et al
as 22-1596
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLENN T. TURNER
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY BOUGHTON, EDWARD WALL, TROY HERMANS and others
Turner v. Computershare, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv00810
Plaintiff:
Gary T Turner
Defendant:
Computershare, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, BNY Mellon Shareholder Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
James Nobles, Jr.In re: James Nobles, Jr.
as 22-60088
Petitioner:
In re: James W. Nobles, Jr. and Angelo Dorizas
Respondent:
Gregory Cole, William M. Cole, Robert Cole and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
