Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02520
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mackie v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10237
Plaintiff:
Keith Mackie
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Peggy Yvonne Fowler, Bryan L. Timm and others
Raul v. Columbia Banking System, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10573
Plaintiff:
Pinchas Raul
Defendant:
Columbia Banking System, Inc., Craig D. Eerkes, Laura Alvarez Schrag and others
K.K. et al v. Premera Blue Cross et al
as 2:2021cv01611
Plaintiff:
K.K. and I. B.
Defendant:
Premera Blue Cross and Columbia Banking System Inc Benefits Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104
Neely v. Umpqua Holdings Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10171
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Neely
Defendant:
Umpqua Holdings Corporation, Columbia Banking System, Inc., Cascade Merger Sub, Inc. and others
Raul v. Columbia Banking System, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv10426
Plaintiff:
Pinchas Raul
Defendant:
Columbia Banking System, Inc., Noel R. Holland, Thomas J. Kemly and others
K. et al v. Premera Blue Cross et al
as 2:2021cv00412
Defendant:
Premera Blue Cross and Columbia Banking System, Inc. Benefits Plan
Plaintiff:
K. K. and I. B.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
United States of America v. $1,693,750.00 Seized from Columbia Bank account ending in 7621
as 4:2021cv01537
Defendant:
$1,693,750.00 Seized from Columbia Bank account ending in 7621
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Claimant:
City Of Houston
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0981
Alston v. Fulton Bank National Association et al
as 8:2020cv02212
Defendant:
The Columbia Bank and Fulton Bank National Association
Plaintiff:
Candace E. Alston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
