Cases 11 - 20 of 64
YOUNG v. SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 1:2021cv00048
Respondent:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniel et al v. Bryson et al
as 1:2021cv00039
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Daniel and Stevee Robinson
Defendant:
Randy Brown, Mary Alston, Timothy Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel et al v. Bryson et al
as 1:2021cv00040
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Daniel and Stevee Robinson
Defendant:
Randy Brown, Mary Alston, Timothy Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv07314
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv02121
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
YOUNG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv76873
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hordon v. Kitsap County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2020cv05464
Defendant:
Andrew Aman, Austin Goff, Justin Childs and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Dirk Hordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Williams et al
as 5:2020cv00141
Defendant:
Robert Bobby Wyche, Kelley Hayes, Director Wright and others
Plaintiff:
JerRoderick Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AIKEN v. PHILPIN et al
as 1:2019cv00191
Defendant:
Sgt. Perry, Sergeant Wilcox, DOCTOR WANTS and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Junior Aiken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gerald v. Mohr et al
as 1:2019cv00754
Defendant:
Timothy Young, Ohio Adult Parole Authority, Annette Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy X. Gerald
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
