Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv09664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
TRIPICCHIO v. THE UPS STORE, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv14512
Plaintiff:
VINCENT TRIPICCHIO
Defendant:
THE UPS STORE, INC. and JB & A ENTERPRISES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MCLAREN v. THE UPS STORE, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv14424
Plaintiff:
BARBARA MCLAREN
Defendant:
THE UPS STORE, INC., RK & SP SERVICES, INC. doing business as UPS Store #4122, HAMILTON PACK N SHIP LLC doing business as UPS Store #4122 and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
VINCENT TRIPICCHIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Fraud
Shavers v. The UPS Store, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00720
Defendant:
The UPS Store, Inc., Generation I. LLC and John Does 1-200
Plaintiff:
Reba Shavers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv04031
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mills v. The UPS Store, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00364
Defendant:
Chandler Westover, Courtney Herring, Austin Elsen and others
Plaintiff:
Alysson Mills
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01906
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Zhuo v. Te Quiero Bebe and 99c Up Store Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00850
Defendant:
Hui Lan Chi and TE QUIERO BEBE AND 99C UP STORE INC.
Plaintiff:
Guang Tong Zhuo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv06833
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Richardson v. The UPS Store, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv12338
Defendant:
The UPS Store, Inc. and J&V Logistics LLC
Plaintiff:
Kevin Richardson, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
