Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Atwood #062887 v. Days et al
as 2:2020cv00623
Defendant:
Unknown Arnold, Pamela Olmstead, Centurion and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Jarvis Atwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricky Ewing v. Gibson, et al
as 19-60724
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN ARNOLD, Individual Capacity and UNKNOWN GIBSON, Individual Capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY R. EWING
Bastian v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv04862
Defendant:
Unknown De La Cruz, Unknown Parties, Unknown Days and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas O Bastian, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ewing v. Gibson et al
as 3:2019cv00420
Defendant:
Dr. Unknown Arnold and Mr. Unknown Gibson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Ricky R. Ewing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Rittner, Sr. v. Jesse Williams, et al
as 19-3402
Defendant / Appellee:
RAY SCHAUBLIN, Assistant Warden, K. WILLIAMS, Chronic Care Scheduler, D. HALL, Victim Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL L. RITTNER, SR.
Ewing v. Arnold et al
as 3:2018cv00773
Plaintiff:
Ricky Ronnell Ewing
Defendant:
Dr. Unknown Arnold and Mr. Unknown McCort
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. Arnold et al
as 3:2018cv00754
Defendant:
MTC, Pelicia Hall, Jerry Williams and others
Plaintiff:
John Hale
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Matthews v. EMCF et al
as 3:2018cv00447
Defendant:
EMCF, Dr. Unknown Arnold, Mr. Unknown McCort and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Interstate Commission of Adult Offender Supervision et al
as 2:2017cv04770
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Ken Christesen, Unknown Bobchak and others
Plaintiff:
Cheri Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walther v. Hastings et al
as 4:2017cv02705
Plaintiff:
Shawn Michael Walther
Defendant:
Unknown Hastings, Unknown Habtemariam, Unknown Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
