Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Emrit v. University of Virginia Darden School of Business et al
as 1:2023cv00403
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
University of Virginia Darden School of Business, Adams & Garth, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Emrit v. University of Virginia Darden School of Business, et al.
as 8:2023cv00977
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
University of Virginia Darden School of Business, et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Emrit v. University of Virginia Darden School of Business et al
as 3:2023cv00017
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
University of Virginia Darden School of Business, Adams & Garth, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Darden et al v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2022pq00453
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Darden and Virginia Darden
Defendant:
Chevron U.S.A., Inc., Syngenta AG and Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Whitehurst et al v. The Kingdom Trust Company
as 4:2019cv04158
Defendant:
The Kingdom Trust Company
Plaintiff:
Roy Tromboli, Virginia Darden, Itzhara Saar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ralph Johnson, Jr. v. David Boone
as 10-1114
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RALPH E. JOHNSON, JR. and VIRGINIA DARDEN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID E. BOONE, DAVID E. BOONE, INCORPORATED, a Virginia corporation, BOONE, BEALE, COSBY, AND LONG, a professional corporation and others
Johnson et al v. Boone et al
as 3:2009cv00808
Plaintiff:
Ralph E. Johnson, Jr. and Virginia Darden
Defendant:
David E. Boone, David E. Boone, Inc., Boone, Beale, Cosby, and Long and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
