Cases 11 - 20 of 59
Anthony Locke v. Uber, et al
as 15-3216
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY LOCKE
Defendant - Appellee:
C/O UBER, DANIEL ZIELEN, MR. MOSIER, Lieutenant in Charge of Disciplinary and others
Stueber et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv02293
Plaintiff:
James Herman Stueber , Thomas W. Walsh , Daniel K. Schultz and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walsh v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv02784
Plaintiff:
Thomas W. Walsh
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walsh v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv00302
Plaintiff:
Thomas W Walsh
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stewart Manago v. W. Walsh, et al
as 14-16208
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEWART MANAGO
Defendant - Appellee:
W. WALSH, Chief Psychologist at CCI, A. JOAQUIN, Chief Medical Executive at CCI, R. MOUSTAFA, Psychiatrist at CCI and others
LANE v. WALSH et al
as 3:2014cv00830
Plaintiff:
Carl Lane
Defendant:
Jerome W Walsh, Lawrence Mahally, J. Zakarauskas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANE v. WALSH et al
as 3:2014cv00078
Plaintiff:
CARL LANE
Defendant:
JEROME W. WALSH, LAWRENCE MAHALLY, J. ZAKARAUSKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MEBANE v. WALSH et al
as 2:2014cv00133
Petitioner:
RAYMOND J. MEBANE
Respondent:
JEROME W. WALSH and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stewart Manago v. Walsh et al
as 1:2013cv01848
Plaintiff:
Stewart Manago
Defendant:
W. Walsh, A. Joaquin, R. Moustafa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montanez v. Walsh
as 3:2013cv02687
Petitioner:
Domingo Colon Montanez
Respondent:
Jerome W Walsh and PA State Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
