Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Luong et al v. Alameda County et al
as 4:2017cv06675
Plaintiff:
Dat Thanh Luong , Ai Qiong Zhong and W.L.
Defendant:
Alameda County, Greg Ahern, Thomas Madigan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eddie Wagle v. Jeri-Ann Sherry
as 16-1717
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDDIE WAGLE
Respondent - Appellee:
JERI-ANN SHERRY, Warden
Hall v. Frieden et al
as 5:2014cv03171
Plaintiff:
Delano E. Hall
Defendant:
Timothy Frieden and Steven M. Wagle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PNC Bank NA v. Gateway Development LLC et al
as 2:2013cv00495
Plaintiff:
PNC Bank NA
Defendant:
Gateway Development LLC , Steven K Peterman, Sudhacker S Wagle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Eddie Wagle v. MDOC, et al
as 12-2526
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE WAGLE
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PATRICIA CARUSO, PATRICIA BARNHART and others
P. Victor Gonzalez v. Planned Parenthood of LA, et al
as 12-56352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
P. VICTOR GONZALEZ, Qui Tam Plainitff, on behalf of the United States and State of California
Defendant - Appellee:
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF LOS ANGELES, AKA Seal A, PLANNED PARENTHOOD SHASTA-DIABLO, AKA Seal B, PLANNED PARENTHOOD GOLDEN GATE and others
Wagle v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2011cv00049
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Perry M. Wagle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-3237
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wagle v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2010cv10506
Plaintiff:
Eddie Wagle
Defendant:
B Skutt, FNU Kohn, Paula Mass and others
Eddie Wagle v. Jeri-Ann Sherry
as 09-2621
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDDIE WAGLE
Respondent - Appellee:
JERI-ANN SHERRY, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
