Cases 11 - 20 of 78
WEBSTER v. APPLE et al
as 1:2022cv01025
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANTHONY WEBSTER
Defendant:
MIKE APPLE, K9 DOG and D. HOLLY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COVINGTON v. MARRIS et al
as 1:2022cv00673
Plaintiff:
MARCUS WAYNE COVINGTON
Defendant:
AMANDA MARRIS, KENDRA BLINN MONTGOMERY, ORLANDO F. HUDSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Battle v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2022ct03312
Plaintiff:
Michael Battle
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant, United States of America, Strickland and Webster L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mos-Bey v. Shroeder et al
as 5:2022ct03184
Plaintiff:
C. Joseph Mos-Bey and Christopher Mosby
Defendant:
Thomas D. Shroeder, John Brubaker, Joe L. Webster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEW CHECKBOOK, LLC v. THE WEBSTER FIRM, P.C. et al
as 1:2022cv00316
Plaintiff:
WEW CHECKBOOK, LLC
Defendant:
THE WEBSTER FIRM, P.C. and STEVEN R. WEBSTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Blackwell v. McFadden et al
as 3:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Adrianna Esther Blackwell
Defendant:
Garry L. McFadden, Dwight D. Weller, Tiffany Parker Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NEUMANN v. WEDELLE et al
as 1:2021cv00892
Petitioner:
WEBSTER R. NEUMANN
Respondent:
WEDELLE, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and MR. WEDELLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bussie v. House Speaker et al
as 5:2021ct03265
Plaintiff:
Anthony Bussie
Defendant:
House Speaker, Webster Earl Britt and Warden Scarantino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. Lyn
as 5:2021hc02151
Petitioner:
Webster Douglas Williams, III
Respondent:
Warden Tamara Lyn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JAMES-EL v. UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2021cv00528
Plaintiff:
HARRY SHAROD JAMES-EL
Defendant:
JOE L. WEBSTER, LORETTA C. BIGGS and UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
