Cases 11 - 20 of 184
Gandt v. Wegner
as 1:2023cv00936
Plaintiff:
Scott Paul Gandt
Defendant:
Katheryn Wegner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wegner v. TRIDENT MARINE SOUTH FLORIDA INC
as 9:2023cv80977
Plaintiff:
John Wegner
Defendant:
TRIDENT MARINE SOUTH FLORIDA INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Rocco v. Wegner
as 2:2023cv03476
Plaintiff:
Belinda Rocco
Defendant:
Andre Nevin Wegner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Young v. Wegner et al
as 0:2023cv00889
Plaintiff:
Jyron Mendale Young
Defendant:
Officer Chris Wegner and Officer Amanda Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEGNER v. Ajanta Pharma USA Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv10117
Plaintiff:
JASON WEGNER
Defendant:
Ajanta Pharma USA Inc., Amneal Pharmaceuticals of New York, LLC, Apotex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Walker v. Unknown Parties
as 5:2022cv00649
Plaintiff:
Randall Lee Walker, Randy Walker, Pork Chop and others
Defendant:
Unknown Parties, Unites States Penitentiary Coleman #2, FNU Swain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Douglas v. Wegner
as 8:2022cv02560
Plaintiff:
Kristin Douglas
Defendant:
Ryon Wegner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts
WEGNER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19467
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS WEGNER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WEGNER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13549
Plaintiff:
RICHARD SCOTT WEGNER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Young v. City of Bloomington Police Department et al
as 0:2022cv01989
Plaintiff:
Jyron Mendale Young
Defendant:
City of Bloomington Police Department, Officer Chris Wegner, City of Richfield Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
